Wagner Logo

 

 

Click here to view more Newsletters by

The Wagner Law Group

 

 

 

 

 

Written by:

Marcia S. Wagner, Esq.

Stephen J. Miguasky, Esq.

Livia Quan Aber, Esq.

 

Published by

The National Underwriter Company/ALM

 

The premier resource guiding professionals through the new requirements established by the DOL's significant new rule.

 

Click here to order this essential reference or Call 800-543-0874

  

 

 

 

The Wagner Law Group

The Wagner Law Group, A Professional Corporation, is a nationally recognized ERISA & employee benefits, estate planning, employment, labor & human resources practice. 

 

Established in 1996, The Wagner Law Group has 24 attorneys engaged exclusively in employee benefits, estate planning and employment law. Five of our attorneys are AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell as having very high to preeminent legal abilities and ethical standards. The firm is among the largest ERISA boutiques in the country. Our practice is national in scope, with clients in more than 40 states and several foreign countries.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact Info

The Wagner Law Group

 

  Integrity | Excellence

  

Boston 

Tel: (617) 357-5200 

Fax: (617) 357-5250 

99 Summer Street 

13th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

  

Palm Beach Gardens 

Tel: (561) 293-3590
Fax: (561) 293-3591
7108 Fairway Drive
Suite 125
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418

   

Tampa

Tel: (813) 603-2959

Fax: (813) 603-2961

101 East Kennedy Boulevard

Suite 2140
Tampa, FL  33602 

  

San Francisco

Tel: (415) 625-0002

Fax: (415) 358-8300

300 Montgomery Street

Suite 600

San Francisco, CA 94104

  

St. Louis

Tel: (314) 236-0065

Fax: (314) 236-5743
100 South 4th Street, Suite 550
St. Louis, MO  63102 

 

 

 

www.wagnerlawgroup.com

 

 

 

 

Follow us on Twitter

 

View our profile on LinkedIn

 

Like us on Facebook 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

September 2, 2016

 

ERISA Law Newsletter

 

 

 

 

WHAT THE DOL'S FINAL FIDUCIARY RULE MEANS FOR PLAN COMMITTEES

 

by Marcia S. Wagner, Esq.

 

 

 

On April 6, 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor ("DOL") released its final rule on fiduciary investment advice and its related exemptions ("Fiduciary Rule") that greatly expands the list of activities that make one a fiduciary and the entities that will be treated as fiduciaries under ERISA. The Fiduciary Rule is a significant regulatory initiative, and thus it is important to understand how it impacts retirement plan committees' fiduciary responsibilities and committee relationships with plan service providers. This article will focus on some of the implications the new Fiduciary Rule will have on retirement plan committee responsibilities.

 

Immediate Effect. At its narrowest scope, the new Fiduciary Rule will have no effect on plans that already have strong retirement plan committees comprised of qualified internal representatives aided by independent fiduciaries. That is, the Fiduciary Rule generally does not expand upon the activities that will result in fiduciary status for retirement plan committees members, since retirement plan committees members are currently ERISA fiduciaries because of their responsibilities for the management of the plan and its assets. The new Fiduciary Rule does not alter the fiduciary duties that ERISA currently imposes on plan fiduciaries - the duties of loyalty, prudence, diversification of plan assets, acting for the exclusive benefit of plan participants and beneficiaries, and administering plans in accordance with their terms.

  

Retirement Plan Committees and Service Providers. Where the new Fiduciary Rule will have an effect on retirement plan committees will be in dealing with service providers who in the past may not have regarded themselves as fiduciaries. For example, in the past, a consultant who was making recommendations that might be perceived as advice could avoid fiduciary responsibility by saying he or she did not render advice "on a regular basis," or that a recommendation was not intended to serve as the "primary basis" for investment decisions. The Fiduciary Rule takes a broader approach and characterizes any investment-related communication that "would reasonably be viewed as a suggestion [to] engage in or refrain from taking a particular course of action" as fiduciary in nature even if the communicator does not intend to give definitive advice (whether on a primary basis, or otherwise). As these consultants will no longer be able to take the position that they are not ERISA fiduciaries, the change in status has a number of possible implications for retirement plan committees.

 

First, because there is a concept under ERISA known as co-fiduciary liability, retirement plan committees' potential fiduciary liability under ERISA is increased. In part for that reason, although more so for the uptick in fiduciary litigation in the past few years, retirement plan committees members might wish to review and possibly increase their fiduciary liability insurance. This fiduciary liability insurance is entirely separate and apart from the ERISA fidelity bond, which only deals with losses due to fraud or dishonesty.

 

Second, the level of disclosure that a fiduciary makes to retirement plan committees is different from the disclosure by a non-fiduciary. For example, a fiduciary must furnish information with respect to its direct and indirect compensation, as well as the conflicts of interest of interest arising from its business model.

 

Third, because of a perceived higher risk of liability as a fiduciary, the fees charged by a service provider that is now being treated as a fiduciary may be higher. That could be relevant from a retirement plan committee's perspective, because it needs to sign off on the compensation being paid to the service provider as reasonable. Payment of unreasonable compensation to a service provider is a prohibited transaction under both the Internal Revenue Code and ERISA.

 

Finally, to the extent that a service provider is acting as a fiduciary, retirement plan committees will want to confirm the manner in which the service provider is dealing with potential conflicts of interest.

 

Investment Education and Distribution. Another area in which the new rules will have an effect, although operationally more upon human resources rather than retirement plan committees, is with respect to investment education and distribution options. The DOL recognized the importance of being able to provide investment education and distribution information to plan participants. It also recognized that the Fiduciary Rule could cause those responsible for providing this information at the plan level to be treated as fiduciaries. Therefore, the DOL created specific conditions which allow for those responsible to not be subject to the Fiduciary Rule. Communications in both of these areas will need to be monitored by retirement plan committees to ensure that a line is not inadvertently crossed converting a permissible non-fiduciary communication into a fiduciary one.

  

IRA Rollovers. The new Fiduciary Rule also extends ERISA investment fiduciary coverage to IRAs. Transactions involving rollovers can have fiduciary implications, and as a result, there may be fewer rollovers from the various plans that are maintained by the plan sponsor, that is, there will be more terminated vested participants with account balances in these plans. Although this will most likely not directly affect plans in 2016 or 2017, retirement plan committees will need start considering how to address the implications this will have on plans in the near future.

  

Big Picture. Retirement plan committees will need to make sure that they have a firm understanding of the Fiduciary Rule and put the proper policies and procedures in place to address the increased responsibilities they have in monitoring the interactions of individual and entities that will be deemed fiduciaries under the new Fiduciary Rule.

 

 

 

This Newsletter is protected by copyright. Material appearing herein may be reproduced with appropriate credit.

 

This Newsletter is provided for information purposes by The Wagner Law Group to clients and others who may be interested in the subject matter, and may not be relied upon as specific legal advice.  This material is not to be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on specific facts. Under the Rules of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, this material may be considered advertising.