Wagner Logo

Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook 

 

 

 

David G. Gabor, Esq. 

 David Gabor is widely recognized as an expert in the area of employment, human resources and business law. He has been called upon to proactively represent clients in litigation, the negotiation and drafting of contracts, handling compliance issues, the creation of corporate infrastructure, the drafting of policies, training of employees and leading companies towards organizational excellence. 

  

 

 

 

The Wagner Law Group

The Wagner Law Group is a nationally recognized practice in the areas of ERISA, employee benefits and executive compensation, trusts and estates, employment, labor and human resources, litigation, investment management, immigration, family and municipal law.

 

Established in 1996, The Wagner Law Group is dedicated to the highest standards of integrity, excellence and thought leadership and is considered to be amongst the nation's premier ERISA and employee benefits law firms. The firm has seven offices across the country, providing unparalleled legal advice to its clients, including large, small and nonprofit corporations as well as individuals and government entities worldwide. The Wagner Law Group's 33 attorneys, senior benefits consultant and five paralegals combine many years of experience in their fields of practice with a variety of backgrounds. Seven of the attorneys are AV-rated by Martindale-Hubbell and six are Fellows of the American College of Employee Benefits Counsel, an invitation-only organization of nationally recognized employee benefits lawyers.  Seven of the firm's attorneys have been named to the prestigious Super Lawyers list for 2018, which highlights outstanding lawyers based on a rigorous selection process.

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Contact Info

The Wagner Law Group

 

  Integrity | Excellence

  

Boston 

Tel: (617) 357-5200 

Fax: (617) 357-5250 

99 Summer Street 

13th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

 

Washington, D.C.

Tel: (202) 969-2800

 

Fax: (202) 969-2568

 800 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Suite 810

Washington, D.C. 20006

 

Chicago

Tel: (847) 990-9034

Fax: (847) 557-1312

190 South LaSalle Street

Suite 2100

Chicago, IL 60603

 

  

Palm Beach Gardens 

Tel: (561) 293-3590
Fax: (561) 293-3591
7108 Fairway Drive
Suite 125
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418

   

Tampa

Tel: (813) 603-2959

Fax: (813) 603-2961

101 East Kennedy Boulevard

Suite 2140
Tampa, FL  33602 

  

San Francisco

Tel: (415) 625-0002

Fax: (415) 358-8300

300 Montgomery Street

Suite 600

San Francisco, CA 94104

  

St. Louis

Tel: (314) 236-0065

Fax: (314) 236-5743
25 W. Moody Avenue
St. Louis, MO  63119

 

Lincoln, MA
Tel: (617) 532-8080
Fax: (617) 532-9090
55 Old Bedford Road
Lincoln, MA 01773

 

 

www.wagnerlawgroup.com

 

 

 

August 28, 2018

 

 

Employment Law Alert

 

A Penny Wise And a Pound Foolish: Lessons Learned from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals 

 

 

 


Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dolgencorp, LLC, d/b/a Dollar General Corporation
serves as a critical lesson of what can happen when managers are not properly prepared. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held in this case that Linda Atkins, an insulin-dependent diabetic, was subjected to disability discrimination when her employer, Dollar General, failed to accommodate a reasonable, medically-based request, and subsequently fired her.

Atkins occasionally suffered from low blood sugar, also know as hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia, which manifests in symptoms such as dizziness, nausea and headaches, may be treated by ingesting a sugary substance such as orange juice. Atkins approached her manager about her medical condition and requested a reasonable accommodation of having orange juice at her register while she worked her shift. The best practice for a manager under similar circumstances would be to enter into an interactive process designed to attempt to find a reasonable accommodation that would enable the employee to perform the essential functions of her job and that would not pose an undue hardship on the employer or disruption to the work environment.  Alternatively, it would be equally good practice for a manager to bring such requests to the human resources department, which is likely better equipped to address the issue. Dollar General's manager simply rejected Atkins request to have access to orange juice at her register, never entering into any interactive process, and it also appears that the manager never alerted human resources of her request.

As a result of the manager's failure to accommodate Atkins' request or find a reasonable and appropriate alternative, or to bring the situation to the attention of Dollar General's human resources department for resolution, Atkins had two hypoglycemic episodes while working and had to take orange juice from the store cooler to address her medical need. She paid the $1.69 store price for the orange juice on both occasions. Nevertheless, Dollar General fired Ms. Atkins and she, in turn, successfully sued and was awarded $722,887: $27,565 in back pay, $250,000 in compensatory damages, and $445,322 in attorneys' fees. Dollar General also, of course, had to absorb the additional cost of its own counsel fees, lost a good employee, and suffered disruption to its workforce.

While it may not always be practical to train managers to deal with specific situations such as Atkins' directly, it is certainly feasible to train managers to identify situations that should be brought to the human resources department to address. Dollar General could have avoided the significant costs resulting from this case had the manager taken Atkins' request for an accommodation to human resources. The company could have entered into the interactive process with Atkins which should have led to a reasonable accommodation. Moreover, had human resources been aware of Atkins' request for an accommodation, the company may have been in a better position to identify the significant risk of litigation under the circumstances and, therefore, not have terminated her employment. This case once again underscores the crucial importance of implementing effective management training.

Please feel free to reach out to
David Gabor to talk about how organizations should handle employee requests for accommodations and effectively training managers to properly respond to such requests.

 

 

 

This Newsletter is protected by copyright. Material appearing herein may be reproduced with appropriate credit.

 

This Newsletter is provided for information purposes by The Wagner Law Group to clients and others who may be interested in the subject matter, and may not be relied upon as specific legal advice.  This material is not to be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on specific facts. Under the Rules of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, this material may be considered advertising.