Wagner Logo

Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook 

 

 

 

The Wagner Law Group

The Wagner Law Group is a nationally recognized practice in the areas of ERISA and employee benefits, estate planning, employment, labor and human resources and investment management.

 

Established in 1996, The Wagner Law Group is dedicated to the highest standards of integrity, excellence and thought leadership and is considered to be amongst the nation's premier ERISA and employee benefits law firms. The firm has seven offices across the country, providing unparalleled legal advice to its clients, including large, small and nonprofit corporations as well as individuals and government entities worldwide. The Wagner Law Group's 34 attorneys, senior benefits consultant and five paralegals combine many years of experience in their fields of practice with a variety of backgrounds. Seven of the attorneys are AV-rated by Martindale-Hubbell and six are Fellows of the American College of Employee Benefits Counsel, an invitation-only organization of nationally recognized employee benefits lawyers.  Seven of the firm's attorneys have been named to the prestigious Super Lawyers list for 2017, which highlights outstanding lawyers based on a rigorous selection process.

 

 

 

Contact Info

The Wagner Law Group

 

  Integrity | Excellence

  

Boston 

Tel: (617) 357-5200 

Fax: (617) 357-5250 

99 Summer Street 

13th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

 

Washington, D.C.

Tel: (202) 969-2800

 

Fax: (202) 969-2568

 800 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Suite 810

Washington, D.C. 20006

 

Chicago

Tel: (847) 990-9034

Fax: (847) 557-1312

190 South LaSalle Street

Suite 2100

Chicago, IL 60603

 

  

Palm Beach Gardens 

Tel: (561) 293-3590
Fax: (561) 293-3591
7108 Fairway Drive
Suite 125
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418

   

Tampa

Tel: (813) 603-2959

Fax: (813) 603-2961

101 East Kennedy Boulevard

Suite 2140
Tampa, FL  33602 

  

San Francisco

Tel: (415) 625-0002

Fax: (415) 358-8300

300 Montgomery Street

Suite 600

San Francisco, CA 94104

  

St. Louis

Tel: (314) 236-0065

Fax: (314) 236-5743
25 W. Moody Avenue
St. Louis, MO  63119 

 

Lincoln, MA

Tel: (617) 532-8080

Fax: (617) 532-9090

55 Old Bedford Road

Lincoln, MA 01773

 

 

www.wagnerlawgroup.com

 

 

 

Severance Plan Not

  Covered by ERISA  

May 24, 2018

 

 

 

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled, in Girardot v. The Chemours Company, that an employer's severance plan is not a welfare benefit plan as defined under ERISA and, therefore, plan participants are not entitled to the protections provided by ERISA.

 

 

Facts.  In conjunction with a corporate spin-off operation, the employer announced the creation of a Voluntary Separation Program ("VSP").  Employees were told that they could elect to be considered for the program only during a specified time period and that additional requests would be considered on a strict, "exception-only" basis.  Participants in the VSP would be terminated and were entitled to payment of a specified lump sum severance benefit plus three months' COBRA premiums.

 

 

The employer stated in a summary of the VSP that it had sole authority and discretion to determine which employees would be eligible to participate in the VSP and that the employer could select some participants to continue working part-time for up to six months after the expected termination date.

 

 

When the VSP did not attract a sufficient number of employees, the employer announced a new severance plan with greater benefits.  Some employees who had accepted the original VSP sued under ERISA, saying they would not have elected to participate in the VSP had they been informed of the possibility that a new severance plan would be implemented with greater benefits.

 

 

Law.  The Supreme Court established the standard for determining whether an employer's  severance policy is a "plan" subject to ERISA in Fort Halifax Packing Co., Inc. v. Coyne.  In Fort Halifax, the Supreme Court held that a one-time lump sum severance payment did not create an ERISA plan because it did not create the need for an "ongoing administrative arrangement."

 

 

Under Fort Halifax, the crucial questions for determining whether an employer's severance policy is a plan subject to ERISA are:

 

  • Is the severance policy more than a one-time lump sum payment to a group of employees triggered by a single event that is not expected to recur?
  • Does the severance policy require an ongoing administrative scheme?

 

Third Circuit.  Recognizing the Supreme Court's ruling, the Third Circuit added that "simple or mechanical determinations do not necessarily require the establishment of an administrative scheme" and that ERISA plans "involve administrative activity potentially subject to employer abuse."  In this case, the employer did not express an intention to provide regular and long-term benefits. On the contrary, it merely entered into an obligation to provide lump sum payments to a class of employees over a defined and relatively brief period. "Determining the amount of these lump sum payments did not require a new administrative body or the exercise of discretion - rather, it involved the mechanical application of a simple formula based on time of employment with the" employer.  Also, the selection and extension-of-employment processes did not involve an ongoing administrative scheme nor did they create a risk of employee abuse or mismanagement of the VSP.

 

 

 

Therefore, because the VSP was not covered under ERISA the court dismissed the lawsuit.

 

 

 

This Newsletter is protected by copyright. Material appearing herein may be reproduced with appropriate credit.

 

This Newsletter is provided for information purposes by The Wagner Law Group to clients and others who may be interested in the subject matter, and may not be relied upon as specific legal advice.  This material is not to be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on specific facts. Under the Rules of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, this material may be considered advertising.